<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Performances&#8230; Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phillydramaqueen.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/hello-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phillydramaqueen.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/hello-world/</link>
	<description>Blogging theater, onstage and off.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Chelmsford</title>
		<link>http://phillydramaqueen.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/hello-world/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>William Chelmsford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Fitzgerald once said &#039;The artist is the only person who can hold two fundementally opposite positions and still function&#039;

Liberalism is political position, not a philosophy. The liberal who defines his or her positions ontologically, so allowing his or herself to operate outside the sphere of their convictions, is at best a deluded realist.
It is interesting to note that many liberals define themselves as fiscal conservatives, whilst extoling the virtues of state spending.
On the flip side of the issue,those conservatives who see present systems as functional need only look at the financial mess the current government has spawned to realise that they themselves are also part of the artistic group defined by Fitzgerald.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitzgerald once said &#8216;The artist is the only person who can hold two fundementally opposite positions and still function&#8217;</p>
<p>Liberalism is political position, not a philosophy. The liberal who defines his or her positions ontologically, so allowing his or herself to operate outside the sphere of their convictions, is at best a deluded realist.<br />
It is interesting to note that many liberals define themselves as fiscal conservatives, whilst extoling the virtues of state spending.<br />
On the flip side of the issue,those conservatives who see present systems as functional need only look at the financial mess the current government has spawned to realise that they themselves are also part of the artistic group defined by Fitzgerald.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Chelmsford</title>
		<link>http://phillydramaqueen.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/hello-world/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>William Chelmsford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Alas how poor is wisdom should it profit only the wise....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas how poor is wisdom should it profit only the wise&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Chelmsford</title>
		<link>http://phillydramaqueen.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/hello-world/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>William Chelmsford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Time present and time past
Are both perhaps present in time future,
And time future contained in time past.
If all time is eternally present</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time present and time past<br />
Are both perhaps present in time future,<br />
And time future contained in time past.<br />
If all time is eternally present</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
